I just found out about pogolinux and their free Fedora giveaway for LUGs:
http://www.pogolinux.com/systems/linuxcd.html
Someone lese has already seen this, right? Free CDs from Canonical and free
CDs from pogo means a whole lot less time buring copies for giveaways.
Jon.
A coworker asked me to post this for him. He's got an SGI Octane that he's wanting to sell. Here's the specs:
MIPS R10000 CPu @ 250Mhz
512MB RAM
1 9GB SCSI HD
Onboard audio/video/100mb ethernet
No cdrom/floppy
This machine is fully supported by linux-mips, as can be seen here:
http://www.linux-mips.org/wiki/IP30
if anyone is interested, contact me here or (preferably) at redelman(a)netstandard.com
I picked up a package of 100 white paper CD sleeves,
and I've designed a KCLUG label to go on the backs of
the paper sleeves.
http://webgiant.sdf1.org/images/KCLUG-ITEC_cd-sleeve-label.jpg
The label is generic enough in that it doesn't mention
a specific type of LiveCD. If other people have burnt
large quantities of Linux LiveCDs but don't have nice
looking sleeves to put them into, I could get more
paper sleeves and labels to go on them.
__________________________________
Yahoo! Music Unlimited
Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/
Better nail down what you want to do. The ITEC thing is next week.
Do we know who is going to be manning the booth? What will be handed
out? What needs to be burned, (preferably need to know before the
weekend so it can be burned and handed off to someone that will be at
ITEC if necessary)? What hardware wil be there? What hardware do we
need? Hardware includes PCs, powerstrips, UPS, table, etc.
Does everyone have tickets that needs them? Badges?
Setup people? Time and day for setup?
I think some of this was still coming together the week of, last year.
*******************************************
If the automobile had followed the same development cycle as the
computer, a Rolls-Royce would today cost $100, get a million miles per
gallon, and explode once a year, killing everyone inside. - Robert X.
Cringely
-----Original Message-----
From: kclug-bounces(a)kclug.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Leo Mauler
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 11:08 AM
To: kclug(a)kclug.org
Subject: Re: Free Fedora CDs
There is the small matter of giveaway CDs from other
companies not having the KCLUG logo or website on
them. Perhaps a lot of jewel cases, printed with
KCLUG info, for the giveaway CDs?
--- Jon Pruente <jdpruente(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> I just found out about pogolinux and their free
> Fedora giveaway for LUGs:
> http://www.pogolinux.com/systems/linuxcd.html
> Someone lese has already seen this, right? Free CDs
> from Canonical and free
> CDs from pogo means a whole lot less time buring
> copies for giveaways.
>
> Jon.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mike Meyer <mwm-keyword-lyx?users.35b043(a)mired.org>
Date: Oct 7, 2005 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: Poor men's scientific workplace.
To: Rich Shepard <rshepard(a)appl-ecosys.com>
Cc: lyx-users(a)lists.lyx.org
In <Pine.LNX.4.62.0510070858420.28087(a)salmo.appl-ecosys.com>, Rich
Shepard <rshepard(a)appl-ecosys.com> typed:
> One of the biggest hurdles for users to pass is the compulsion to tweak
> minor appearance details.
My explanation of the LaTeX/LyX philosphy is:
Word processors make it easy to get the pages that look exactly like
you want them to. LaTeX/LyX makes it easy to get professional looking
pages. Unless you're a professional designer of such, the two will be
unrelated. Decide which you want, and use the right tool for the job.
<mike
--
Mike Meyer <mwm(a)mired.org> http://www.mired.org/consulting.html
Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.
--
David L Nicol
"You aren't being graded on how many you respond to." -- joe
What's a "geet"?
*******************************************
If the automobile had followed the same development cycle as the
computer, a Rolls-Royce would today cost $100, get a million miles per
gallon, and explode once a year, killing everyone inside. - Robert X.
Cringely
-----Original Message-----
From: kclug-bounces(a)kclug.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of David Nicol
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 12:01 PM
To: Chris Bier
Cc: KCLUG (E-mail)
Subject: Re: ITEC talk or not
We're going to have an unstructured discussion. Call it "meek the
geets."
No matter what we promise, that's what it'll turn into, so lets start
with the
truth.
Hi All,
Here are the suggestions:
-Talk about the Live CDs and show what they can do
-Have a Linux Q&A session
-Full Linux install
-All of the above
-Some of the above
-Devote our resources to the show and not worry about the session at all
What the ITEC people need to know by tomorrow (Tuesday Oct 6th) is if we
are going to do anything. They would also like to have a paragraph or
so on what we are going to talk about.
Chris
--
I digitally sign my emails. If you see an attachment with .asc, then
that means your email client doesn't support PGP digital signatures.
http://www.gnupg.org/(en)/documentation/faqs.html#q1.1
Fyodor <fyodor(a)insecure.org>
Sent by: nmap-hackers-bounces(a)insecure.org
10/05/2005 04:43 PM
To
nmap-hackers(a)insecure.org
cc
Subject
Nessus closes source => How to help open source projects
Nmap Hackers,
In the last Insecure.Org Security Tools survey, you guys proudly voted
Nessus #1. It complements the functionality of Nmap by going further
to detect application-level vulnerabilities. Then in February of this
year, Tenable changed the Nessus license to further restrict the
plugins and require that you fax them a permission request form before
you use Nessus for any consulting engagements. Renaud wrote to this
list on Feb 8
(http://seclists.org/lists/nmap-hackers/2005/Jan-Mar/0001.html),
explaining that their new slogan ("the open-source vulnerability
scanner") was accurate because the engine was still open source.
Today, their slogan has changed to "the network vulnerability
scanner", and you can probably guess what that means. In the
announcement below, Renaud announces that Nessus 3 (due in a couple
weeks) will be binary only and forbid redistribution. They say it
will be free, for now, if you use the delayed plugin feed. They have
also announced that Nessus 3 will be faster and contain various other
improvements. They promise to maintain GPL Nessus 2 for a while, but
I wouldn't count on that lasting long.
I am not taking a position on this move, but I do feel it is worth
noting for the many Nessus users on this list. Tenable argues that
this move is necessary to further improve Nessus and/or make more
money. Perhaps so, but the Nmap Project has no plans to follow suit.
Nmap has been GPL since its creation more than 8 years ago and I am
happy with that license.
When asked why they are making this change, Renaud replied to the
Nessus list today that open source hasn't really worked for Nessus
because "virtually nobody has ever contributed anything to improve the
scanning _engine_ over the last 6 years." This may be the most
important and useful point we can take from this change. Open source
really is a two-way street. The only way we (open source projects)
can seriously compete with projects staffed by dozens or hundreds of
paid full time developers is by having hundreds or thousands of
volunteers each contributing a little bit part time. So if you are a
heavy user of open source software, please think about how you can
help out. Here are some ideas:
o If you are feeling ambitious, write and distribute your own little
program to solve a problem you are having or otherwise makes your
life easier. It doesn't have to be anything big or fancy at first.
Nmap started out as a little 2,000-line utility published in Phrack
magazine. Post your creation to Freshmeat, or to nmap-dev if it
relates to Nmap in some way. Hmm, I think there is a current vacuum
in the open source vulnerability scanner field :).
o Or take a more active coding role for an existing open source
project. In the Nmap world, former Google SoC students are
developing three promising projects: NmapGUI and UMIT are new GUIs
and results viewers for large Nmap scans, and Ncat is a powerful
reinterpretation of the venerable Netcat. Working code for all
three of these is available if you join the Nmap-dev list
(http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev) and I'm sure the
respective authors (Ole Morten Grodaas, Adriano Monteiro, and Chris
Gibson) would appreciate help, feedback, and testing.
o Find a bug in some open source software? Try to reproduce it with
the latest version of the software and do some web searching to see
if it is already known/fixed. If not, report it with full details
about how to reproduce it and the platform and software version of
the software you are running. It is even better if you can submit a
patch which fixes the problem.
o Join the relevant mailing lists for the project and help out new
users. Maybe you can write or translate some documentation, such as a
tutorial for using the product or a HOWTO for using it to solve a
common need.
o The Nmap Project does not accept financial donations, but many other
projects do. If some little project does exactly what you need and
saves you half a day of work or makes it into your regular-usage
arsenal of tools, consider kicking the author back $5 or $10. Not
only will it help defray costs of the project, but it shows the author
that users really appreciate his/her work and thus makes a newer
version more likely. Similarly, if you see an ad on the project
web site that interests you, click on it and spend a couple minutes
checking the product out.
o Spread the word! Commercial software houses pay to spread the word
about their product in magazines, web sites, TV, conferences, etc.
Open source projects such as Nmap can't. So if you find a project
useful, don't hesitate to post a link on your web page and mention it
(including the URL) on mailing list, newsgroup, and web forum posts.
Those are a few ideas, and I'm sure you can think of more based on
your experience, expertise, and available resources. Rather than mope
over the loss of open source Nessus, we can treat this as a call to
action and a reminder not to take valuable open source software such
as Ethereal, DSniff, Ettercap, gcc, emacs, apache, OpenBSD, and Linux
for granted.
Cheers,
Fyodor
PS: Here is the Nessus announcement:
----- Forwarded message from Renaud Deraison
<rderaison(a)tenablesecurity.com> -----
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 12:16:45 -0400
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.734)
From: Renaud Deraison <rderaison(a)tenablesecurity.com>
To: nessus(a)list.nessus.org, nessus-announce(a)list.nessus.org
Cc:
Subject: [Nessus-announce] Nessus Roadmap / Nessus 3.0.0rc1 testers wanted
Hi everyone,
We are a few weeks away from releasing Nessus 3.0.0, and I'd like to
take some time to explain our roadmap in this regard.
Nessus 3 / Nessus 2 Roadmap
----------------------------
Nessus 3 is major enhancement of the key components of the Nessus
engine - the NASL3 intepreter has been rewritten from scratch, the
process management has changed to reduce the overhead of executing a
plugin (instead of creating NxM processes, nessusd now only creates N
processes), the way plugins are stored has been improved to reduce
disk usage, etc...
Nessus 3 also contains a lot of built-in features and checks to debug
crashes and mis-behaving plugins more easily, and to catch
inconsistencies early.
As a result, Nessus 3 is much faster than Nessus 2 and less resource
intensive. Your mileage may vary, but when scanning a local network,
Nessus 3 is on average twice as fast as Nessus 2, with spikes going
as high as 5 times faster when scanning desktop windows systems.
Nessus 3 will be available free of charge, including on the Windows
platform, but will not be released under the GPL.
Nessus 3 will be available for many platforms, but do understand that
we won't be able to support every distribution / operating system
available. I also understand that some free software advocates won't
want to use a binary-only Nessus 3. This is why Nessus 2 will
continue to be maintained and will stay under the GPL.
To make things simple :
- Nessus 2 : GPL, will have regular releases containing bug fixes
- Nessus 3 : free of charge, contains major improvements
The two versions can share most of their plugins -- we intend to
maintain backward compatibility whenever possible for most
vulnerability checks. Some checks will only work on Nessus 3 (ie: we
are about to release a set of plugins to determine policy
compliance), but the huge majority will work on either platform
likewise.
Finally, the Nessus GUI has been split in a separate project
(NessusClient) which is released under the GPL. The 'nessus' client
in Nessus3 is CLI only, as it will be in Nessus 2.4.x. For a GUI, use
NessusClient.
Testers needed
---------------
That being said, we are looking for experienced Nessus users who
would want to try Nessus 3.0.0rc1. For the sake of simplicity, we
would like users running on Red Hat ES3 or ES4 platforms or
compatible. We are looking for people scanning big networks, mostly
to collect performance information. Keep in mind that Nessus3 is CLI
only, so you'll have to use NessusWX or be familiar with the CLI.
If you are interested in testing Nessus 3.0.0rc1, please drop me a
line at <deraison(a)nessus.org> (no @gmail/@hotmail/@anonymous accounts
please).
Thanks,
-- Renaud
_______________________________________________
Nessus-announce mailing list
Nessus-announce(a)list.nessus.org
http://mail.nessus.org/mailman/listinfo/nessus-announce
----- End forwarded message -----
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-hackers mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-hackers
-----------------------------------------
This e-mail and any attachments are intended only for the individual or
company to which it is addressed and may contain information which is
privileged, confidential and prohibited from disclosure or unauthorized use
under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, or copying of
this e-mail or the information contained in this e-mail is strictly
prohibited by the sender. If you have received this transmission in error,
please return the material received to the sender and delete all copies
from your system.
Anyone have any experience networking a PowerMac
running OS 8.x and a MacMini running OSX? My
brother-in-law needs to connect the two, and somehow
connect a PC into the network as well.
Been considering adding a fourth computer into the
mix, a Linux server box, and using a shared Linux
drive to share files between the computers. It would
involve sharing a Linux directory as both an HFS share
and a SMB share simultaneously.
However, getting the Macs networked together is the
most important bit. We'd be using an Ethernet switch
to connect the two Macs together. Considered a
crossover cable and discarded that idea early on.
I've found some solutions but cheap and/or free is the
order of the day here. The expensive solutions tend
to be Ethernet and the cheap solutions tend to be
weird (such as connecting the two via null modem
cable).
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com