-----Original Message----- From: Steven Hildreth
If used properly Portage is very powerful and works very well.
Therein lies the rub. It is not all that trivial to make it and keep it working properly. Especially if you go trying to run certain specific apps or when you have one app that gets removed from the portage list. I've had portage break on me several times, but maybe I'm loading unusual apps, or they've improved portage. Not that portage isn't a great package management utility. It's far far better than rpm. But you still have to compile everything. In the time it take you to run one portage, I can run a dozen apt-get update && apt-get upgrades, given equivalent systems and not off-loading the compiles to a compile-farm.
Don't get me wrong, I like gentoo. I just think that debian is the easiest and most stable methods of running Linux and keeping it up to date. The only thing that would be better is tweaked debian the way SuSE, Mandrake and RH tweak the kernel and other code to run better. Most of those tweaks find their way back into the community, but not necessarily all.
Brian D.
On Thursday 18 November 2004 05:39 pm, Brian Densmore wrote:
Not that portage isn't a great package management utility. It's far far better than rpm.
RPM and Portage are almost completely different tools for very different purposes. All RPM does is manage the packages - it handles the installations, tracks what's installed, and what's dependent on what. The portage system includes the ability to fetch packages, fetch dependent packages, etc. It would be more realistic to compare Portage to up2date, urpmi, or YaST.
I recommend CentOS (http://www.centos.org)
It is a freely recompiled version of RedHat Enterprise Linux.
It has the same benefits and problems as RHEL 3.
It uses yum for the auto-updater and has many mirrors worldwide.
I second the CentOS recommendation. I have only been using it for a few weeks, but has worked very well as a drop-in replacement for RedHat 7.3 and RedHat 9.
Best Regards,
Jason R. Park E-Mail: [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rocky McGaugh Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 11:39 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Server Distributions
I recommend CentOS (http://www.centos.org)
It is a freely recompiled version of RedHat Enterprise Linux.
It has the same benefits and problems as RHEL 3.
It uses yum for the auto-updater and has many mirrors worldwide.