Jason Clinton wrote:
Steven Hildreth wrote:
Is w3/wia and w3/HTML compliance a requirement of the replacement offering? Never was mentioned to me when I offered to create a new modern, dynamic replacement site.
I'm sorry no one said so. Anyone who does web design should already be familiar with those requirement; it's something of a given -- perhaps Hal and Chris assumed you knew that.
No CMS stock package I have found (I have tested several for a previous project including; PhpNuke, PostNuke, Slashcode, eGroupare, Mambo, and XOOPS) generates either w3/wia or w3/HTML compliant code.
We may be able to yet find one that does.
Such as plone? From http://www.plone.org:
"Plone is standard. Plone carefully follows standards for usability and accessibility. Plone pages are compliant with US Section 508, and the W3C's AA rating for accessibility, in addition to using best-practice web standards like XHTML and CSS."