3 Apr
2008
3 Apr
'08
8:50 p.m.
On Thursday 03 April 2008, Jeffrey Watts wrote:
So I put it to Luke thus (and I'm echoing Leo): If Stallman (the most hardheaded and fervent Free Software advocate on the planet) and Torvalds (the reason you're here) both say it's cool, how is it that you feel that your viewpoint is superior?
Torvalds has nothing to do with why I'm here. If Linux didn't exist, we'd be using either HURD or a BSD kernel.
Stallman doesn't think everything should be free, and admits there is a legal problem, so what's your argument again?