On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:53 AM, Adrian Griffis [email protected] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Christofer C. Bell [email protected] wrote:
I wouldn't call it ironic since Jeffrey didn't CC the mailing list with a personal argument to try to get support from the peanut gallery. Jeffrey quoted a posting Leo sent to the list himself. Here's the relevant header information if anyone would like to see for themselves:
To: [email protected] In-Reply-To: [email protected] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: [email protected]
Are you sure? It seems to me that Leo was criticising Jeffery for something, but his very act of criticising Jeffery was at least as offensive, in the way relevant to his criticism, as Jeffery's email. Would that not qualify as ironic?
Oh, that's very possible. I may have misunderstood your sentiment. I thought you were highlighting the possible irony of Jeffrey doing something (quoting a private email to the list to garner some kind of support) that he's not done, based on Leo's comments, while Leo himself has been fairly consistent in being guilty of it, especially with regards to mail from Billy Crook.
My only concern with filtering out Leo's messages is that folks still respond to him and disjointed conversations actually drive me more nuts than any of Leo's "insight" possibly can.